A Triadic, or Three Branch, Government has Three mutually functional sides.

Obviously, a Triadic, or a Three Branch, form of Government has Three sides. Equally obvious, no side can exist by itself, and the continued existence of a Three Branch Government is dependent on 'all' its functions, or on the function of all its sides, i.e., in a 'condition of togetherness', and a condition of 'mutual interaction of its People, in 'Three different ways'. That is important for a governmental structure to function as a 'whole', i.e., with its own 'integrity', as an 'institutional power'. Otherwise, the result would be a 'lame' structure of government; and democracy is 'not' a lame government. It is not 'lame' or 'weak', because the Power of the Top emanates from the People at the Bottom, from each and every Individual in the Democracy. Any 'Institutional form' must have a basis for its existence, and for its continuing 'support'. Hence the 'strength' of the People at the Bottom, in 'their condition of togetherness', which is conveyed to the Top of a democracy, in the form, or, 'grant' of an 'Institutional Power', has its source in the 'People'. People's 'strength' in 'togetherness', is 'institutionally' converted into 'political power' at the Top. These Three basic functions of Democratic Government cannot be 'dis-functional'. For any one side of the Triadic form of government to attempt to legally sue, another side, is an act of 'political Deconstruction', at the Top. We can expect Revolutions at the Bottom, but how can we accept 'dissolutions' at the Top? On a less 'political perception', its like authorizing some individual to shoot himself/herself on the foot. Its ludicrous and politically unacceptable.