Political Discourse is different from Other forms of Discourse.

Political Discourse is different from 'Other Forms' of Discourse. Usually, Political Discourse is 'modeled' after the 'Forms' of the Ideology of the Political Entity. 'Democratic discourse' differs from 'Autocratic Discourse' and 'Plutocratic Discourse'. However, when a 'Social problem' arises in any 'Political Entity', the problem is usually addressed in the 'Linguistic habits' of the 'Ideology'. Each Ideology has its 'Language', but 'all Ideologies' must distinguish between a 'Problem' that is 'Social in Nature' and one that is 'Political In Nature'. If its 'Political' the 'Linguistic Terms' of the 'Ideology' kick in. But, what if its a 'Human Problem' or a 'Health Problem' which involves all the 'Human Beings', both at the Top and at the Bottom; e.g. Hurricanes, Earthquakes; or Pandemics. Of course, each Ideology has 'Power at the Top' and will handle the Problem accordingly. But, in a 'Democracy', the 'Power at the Top' has been 'transferred' from the 'Bottom' to the 'Top' and the 'Power of Office' will exist only for a 'limited Time'. Hence, the question arises, how does a 'Democracy' handle a 'Human Problem'? Human Problems exist for a 'short time' or a 'Long Time. If its a Pandemic it will exist until the Problem is 'Scientifically' or 'Medically' addressed and resolved. That Issue is 'not Political'; its Human. Nevertheless, National maneuvering is required. Only a 'Unified approach' can be successful because it involves the entire 'Human Condition' at the Bottom. This is not a time for 'Party Loyalties' or 'Party Distinctions'. What's the use for having Power at the Top in a Democracy when the entire 'Human Population' is at risk and there is no 'Unified Approach'. We need to stop 'playing Politics'.