A 'Political Ideology' is a Human 'Institution'; a 'Political Bottom' is a Human 'Condition'.

A 'Political Ideology' is a Human 'Institution'; a 'Political Bottom' is a Human 'Condition'. Thats a dilemma that has existed a very long time. The main reason for its existence is that both the 'Top' and the 'Bottom' can only 'function' if both are occupied by 'Human Beings'. A 'Machine' or a 'Computer' cannot Govern a Bottom of 'Human Beings'. The dichotomy requires 'Human Leaders' and 'human followers'. Neither should be required to lose their 'Humanity' in order to 'serve' at the 'Top' or the 'Bottom'. Hence one must ask, why are their Autocracys, Plutocracies, or Oligarchies. The answer is simple. Some Humans want a focused 'Political Power' for whatever reason they may have; and the Others can be 'Governed' by the 'Political Power' from the Top. Governance or Rule can only come from a Political Top because thats the 'Institution' that will 'Govern or Rule' the Bottom. In either case, some semblence of stability must prevail at the Top and at the Bottom. A 'Political Top' can only have 'attributed' Political power because it only has that attributed 'Political Power' for the 'duration' of the 'Office' or, it can have 'arbitrary use of the Power'. Of course, one of the most 'arbitrary' uses of Power in the past was the so-called 'Divine Right of Kings'. Why? Because it permeated every aspect of the 'Political Entity', both the Top and the Bottom. Today, all 'Religious Systems' in the 'Social' are kept separate by the 'Institutional Structuring' of the 'Social' and the 'Political'. Every Political Structure is a 'Manufactured Institution' and every 'Political Bottom' is formed of 'Human Individuals'. In Governemnt Entities, the Issue is always, 'Do we Govern or do we Rule? There is a big difference between 'Government' and 'Rulers'.