Creating " Persons" that are 'Legal Fictions' in the Economy seems misguided.

Creating "Persons" that are Legal Fictions in the Economy seems misguided; or, to say it differently; creating 'Legal Structures' that are considered 'Legal Fictions' and calling them 'Persons' in the Economy seems misguided. Why are they necessary and at the 'very place' where 'Competition between Human Beings' takes place. The Law has created a 'Monster Worker' that is Immortal because it cannot die and if it's been around for Many years can merely change Name and 'continue its existence'. Sure it contributes to Economic Acheivement, but what about 'Economic Balance' within 'Social Balance' among 'Real Human Workers'? Why does the Law favor 'Legal Fictions' when those Fiction's sole function is to Function as 'Autocrats' and make Money. Of course, 'Small Corporations' can become 'disfunctional' or go bankrupt. But, the Big Corporations 'cannot fail' and can merely change 'Names' or be 'Bailed out' by the Government and continue their Immortality. Of course, 'Big Corporations' are important but, what about the Little Guy? That seems like a misguided focus on the concept of the 'Economy' and 'not' on some 'Social Good'. Democracy is a good system and is designed to Contribute towards the 'Welfare of the Human Condition' and certainly 'Economic Competition' between Humans is highly regarded and necessary. But, why does the 'Huge Business Corporation' function as an 'Autocrat' and not a 'Democrat', and why not 'Re-Conceive' them to have 'Democratic functions' that contribute towards a more 'Democtaic Social'. All it takes is an Amendment of the Purpose Clause.