'Politics' is about Political Power over the 'Many' at the 'Bottom'.

Politics is about Political Power over the 'Many' at the Bottom. But the 'Many' includes 'all' the Human Beings at the Bottom of the 'Political Entity'. The 'Top' does not 'govern' 'Political Parties'; it Governs the Social of 'Real Individuals' situated at the 'Bottom'. But, the 'Real Individuals' at the 'Bottom' have seen fit to 'divide-up' into 'Parties'; an interesting phenomena, since all the Real Individuals are 'Free and Equal'. Of course there are Different States which are also Political 'Entities of Power'. Nevertheless, both Federal and State Entities are required to comply with the Constitution; hence, all Individuals are Free and Equal at the Bottom and both must enact 'Law and Order' within their respective Jurisdictions. So, why did the 'Individuals' at the 'Bottom' divide into 'Parties'. Of course, its a 'Personal' Decision to do So. Not all Political Ideologies would allow that. Most Authoritarian Ideologies would not allow that. Nevertheless, this Division into Parties should not impede the Democracy that allows it. But, neither should that be a reason for antagonism and outright animosity between the Parties. If Both Parties are Democratic, why should such an 'Ideological Clash' exist? Is it that one Party follows the 'Free and Equal Doctrine' of the 'Individuals' in the Social, while the other follows the 'Economic standard' of 'More and More' of the Same, to wit; Money. Isn't this the same 'distinction' between the 'Haves' and the 'Have Nots'?

Political Discourse is different from Other forms of Discourse.

Political Discourse is different from 'Other Forms' of Discourse. Usually, Political Discourse is 'modeled' after the 'Forms' of the Ideology of the Political Entity. 'Democratic discourse' differs from 'Autocratic Discourse' and 'Plutocratic Discourse'. However, when a 'Social problem' arises in any 'Political Entity', the problem is usually addressed in the 'Linguistic habits' of the 'Ideology'. Each Ideology has its 'Language', but 'all Ideologies' must distinguish between a 'Problem' that is 'Social in Nature' and one that is 'Political In Nature'. If its 'Political' the 'Linguistic Terms' of the 'Ideology' kick in. But, what if its a 'Human Problem' or a 'Health Problem' which involves all the 'Human Beings', both at the Top and at the Bottom; e.g. Hurricanes, Earthquakes; or Pandemics. Of course, each Ideology has 'Power at the Top' and will handle the Problem accordingly. But, in a 'Democracy', the 'Power at the Top' has been 'transferred' from the 'Bottom' to the 'Top' and the 'Power of Office' will exist only for a 'limited Time'. Hence, the question arises, how does a 'Democracy' handle a 'Human Problem'? Human Problems exist for a 'short time' or a 'Long Time. If its a Pandemic it will exist until the Problem is 'Scientifically' or 'Medically' addressed and resolved. That Issue is 'not Political'; its Human. Nevertheless, National maneuvering is required. Only a 'Unified approach' can be successful because it involves the entire 'Human Condition' at the Bottom. This is not a time for 'Party Loyalties' or 'Party Distinctions'. What's the use for having Power at the Top in a Democracy when the entire 'Human Population' is at risk and there is no 'Unified Approach'. We need to stop 'playing Politics'.

A Virus endangers a Nation; the Solution is not Political.

A Virus endangers a Nation; The solution is not 'Political'; the solution is not a 'Party Issue'; its a 'health issue' and it endangers the Life of all the 'Real Persons' at the 'Bottom'. So why are Politicians assuming 'Political postures'? Is it because they're thinking of 'Elections' instead of the 'Health and Safety' of the 'Population at the Bottom' of the Political Entity. Why should 'Children' be 'forced' into the School Systems and exposed to a Virus that may effect their Life or the Life of their Parents? How can 'so-called' 'Political Leaders' of a 'Political Entity' expose the Children of a Nation to 'existing dangers' that could prove Fatal. Who are the ignorant 'Individuals', or 'Person'; those at the 'Top' or those at the 'Bottom'? Every Nation should have a 'Monetary Fund' that could handle 'Catastrophic Occurrences' at the 'Bottom', such as Floods, Hurricanes, Earth Quakes, or 'Pandemics'. Does the 'Top' have such a 'Fund' or is it too busy 'Building a Wall'? A Real Political Resolution would focus on resolving the Problem and not on exposing the Population, especially the children, to the dangers of a Pandemic. How can Politics even be referred too as a 'Political Science'? Where are the 'True Politicians'?

A 'Corporation' is a 'creation of Law'; a 'Business Corporation' is a 'creation of the Economy'.

A 'Corporation' is a 'creation of law'; a 'Business Corporation' is also a creation of Law; however its a creation that 'functions solely' in the Economy. The Corporation is an 'essential' Social Creation; nevertheless, the 'sole function' of the 'Business corporation' is to 'augment' 'productivity and manufacturing' of 'essential economic needs' and 'Social' products and social needs. Its sole function has made it a 'Huge Entity. The 'Supreme Court' saw fit to 'categorize' that Entity as a 'Person' that 'exists in 'Contemplation of Law'. The result is that the Courts have created a 'Huge Person'. Of course, the 'Businesses' and 'Workers' and 'Human Producers' that compete in the 'same or 'similar activity' are 'small' in comparison. This fact 'contributes' to the categorization of the 'Social' as a 'Corporate Society'. A 'Corporate Society' is one where the 'Business Corporation' rules 'Both' the 'Economy' and the 'Social'. It creates 'Social Classes', 'Economic' Classes, and 'Classes' in 'Person-Hood'. A 'Legal Fiction' exists 'Side by Side' with 'Human Beings' and they 'function' and 'compete' with the 'Human Condition'. No wonder we are called a 'Corporate Society'. Business Corporations function solely as 'Economic Entities'; they need more 'Democratic functions' and 'values'. If they are going to be 'Persons in contemplation of Law', they must contribute to the 'Democracy' that allows them to 'exist as such'.