The Problematic between the Top and the Bottom is not easy to resolve.

The Problematic between the Top and the Bottom is not easy to resolve. The Top needs to be establihed as an Institution that 'Protects' and 'Governs' the 'Real Individuals' at the Bottom. Of course, there are many 'Forms of Government' for doing that. Purportedly, there's the Autocratic Form, the Plutocratic Form, and, of course, the Democratic Form. If the Form Chosen is the Democratic Form the Real Individuals at the Bottom play a very important part in the Institution. Hence; its called 'Governing', not 'Ruling'. Democracy doesnt Rule; it 'Governs'. The Democratic Form Governs the 'Freedom and Equality' of the 'Real Individual'. It emphasizes the 'Freedom and Equality' of the Real 'Person' as contrasted with the 'Democratic Rights' of the 'Corporate Person'. The 'Corporate Person' is recognized by Law as a 'Legal Fiction' and is 'not' a 'Real Human Person'. The 'Rights' it may have, may be called 'Business Rights', but, never 'Human Rights'. Its not 'Human'. Another Form of Government is the 'Socialistic Form'; it 'owns' the 'means of Production'. Its 'not Socialistic' to 'Govern' and 'promote the General Welfare' and 'secure the Blessings of Liberty' for the Real Individuals at the Bottom. Thats Governing. Politicians are calling a Democratic Form of governing Socialistic because it 'helps' the 'Real Individual' at the Bottom; and that is a blatent, intentional fabrication. Politics has been reduced to 'name calling', coarse language, misrepresentations, and an attempt to 'Rule', instead of 'Governing'.