One cannot 'organize' the 'Human Condition' into a 'Polity' without protecting its 'Freedom and Equality'.

One cannot 'organize' the 'Human Condition' into a 'Political Polity', without protecting its 'Freedom' and Equality'. All 'Political Structures' are 'Institutional' or 'Man Made' and all 'Real Individuals' are 'Nature Made', or 'Natural'. Hence, all 'Natural Individuals' must be 'Respected' and their 'Nature' must be 'Protected'. Hence, an Individuals 'Freedom and Equality' must be protected in any Political, Institutional, Structure for the simple reason that it is only an 'Institution' and not a product of 'Nature'. Man-made Institutions do not have to exist, but when they do, its because they have become 'Institutionally necessary'. Hence, the Institutional organizations of a 'Polity' has a 'Duty' to Protect and Preserve the 'Natural Freedom and Equality' of all the Real Individuals in the Polity. Any Polity that disrespects or fails to protect the 'Natural Condition' and the 'Values' of the 'Human Condition' is not a 'Democratic Polity'. Having said that, it becomes easier to conceptualize the usual dilemmas of Human beings having to exist within Political Entities. All Political 'Tops' have 'Political Power', but that 'Power' is 'Institutional' and 'only' Institutional. The Bottom of the Entity has a 'condition of togetherness', where all 'Real Individuals' have 'Freedom and Equality'. The Top Governs and 'only' Governs a Nation 'Politically' and 'Represents' it on the 'International' sphere. All the real Individuals at The Bottom of every Democratic Polity 'must' be Free and Equal. Failing that, the Nation and its 'Bottom' or 'Social' is transforming into a 'Plutocracy'. That means that the Economy; its Institutions, its 'Language', dominates the Political Entity and its 'Political Discourse'. A Political Entity 'transforms' into an 'Economic Entity' and its accompanying Linguistic usage of 'more and more of the Same', and the 'childish' attitude expressed in the 'childish saying', "My Dad has more Money than your Dad". 'Nature' cannot be changed; but, 'Institutions' surely can. Where are the Real Politicians?

Maybe Computerization can 'facilitate' a real 'Freedom and Equality'.

Maybe, Computerization can 'facilitate' a 'Real' Freedom and Equality. But in order to work in that direction, the 'Economic dialogue' and 'value system' of "More and More of the Same" ( Money) that dominates the 'Social' and helps create 'economic classes', needs to change into a 'Real Political Dialogue' of 'Freedom' and 'Equality'. The 'Real Individual' at the 'Bottom' of the 'Political Entity' has become 'jaded' to 'Real' Freedom and Equality and no longer seems to be able to 'experience' them in a 'genuine sense'. The 'Domineering influence' of Economic values has 'transformed' the Social into a 'Plutocratic Social'; a 'Plutocratic Social' within a 'Democratic Polity'. A Social 'peopled' with 'Legal Fictions' and the 'Rich' and the 'Very Rich'. What happened? The Bottom i.e. the 'Many'; the 'People' allowed it to happen and 'More and More of the Same' is 'easy' for a 'mechanized' Corporate Economy. But a mechanized Economy needs employees to operate the machines. But, computation can also operate the machines at 'No' to 'Negligible cost', hence, 'operating expenses' are much lower and 'employees' become unnecessary and hence 'cost of production' is reduced. 'Corporate Fictions' can then help provide the 'Democratic Social' with 'essential needs'. After all, if the Corporation is a 'Legal Fiction' and exists 'only' in 'Contemplation of Law', it should also have 'Democratic Duties', as do all Human Beings in the Social. This kind of 'economic move' can help 'Americanize Legal Fictions' from a condition of just being a Huge 'Money Making Machine' to an 'improved level' of 'American citizenship'. We've already said that 'Legal Fictions', if they're going to exist, need more 'Democratic Duties'. Well, Computerization may help. But, the 'Dialogue of Economics', of a 'Plutocratic Social' must change to a 'Political Dialogue' of 'Democratic Governing' and 'Real Freedom and Real Equality' of the 'Real Individual' at the 'Bottom of the Polity'. The Richest Nation in the World should not have People who are Hungry, Homeless, and not provided with the 'essential living conditions' and 'Medical needs' of a Democratic Social. Where are the Real Politicians?

How does a 'Democratic Society' transform into an 'Economic Society'?

How does a 'Democratic Society' transform into an 'Economic Society'? Of course, we are still a 'Democratic Polity', but how does the Linguistic Usage of Economics 'dominate' the Democratic 'Political' Dialogue? Or, stated differently, how do People become more 'concerned' with 'Possessions and Money' status and 'Racial Status' than with 'Freedom and Equality'? The distinction is 'subtle' but if we could listen and 'Hear', all at once, the 'Political' conversations of the 'Top', it would have an 'Economic resonance' of 'Money and Possessions', an Economic 'Standard'. Economic Values dominate the Political conversation. Do Individuals who seek High Office in a Democracy focus on Democratic Values or Economic values? Of course, those two factors are difficult to 'isolate' and 'weigh', on any one occasion, but the 'general tenor' of some 'political Conduct' can be 'sensed' in some Individuals and the 'main concern' appears to be 'Economic'. The Economy is 'important' but, where is Freedom and Equality? The emphasis on the economic has helped create 'Economic Classes' and the 'favorable' treatment of the Tax Rates of 'Corporate Fictions' is an insult to the 'Freedom and Equality' of the 'Real' Individual. The 'economic Legal Fictions' are favored over the 'Real Individuals' at the Bottom of a Real Democratic Social. That 'conversation' has created the 'Haves' and 'Have-nots', the Rich and the Poor. Now, please understand, I'm not against Economics, but all the 'advances' in the Economy have been facilitated because we live in a Democracy. The 'Political Conversation' should be on Democracy, not Economics. Today, with the advances in 'Computerization', the possibility of 'equalizing' Production and especially 'costs' has become possible and some inroads into that technology has been made possible. Hence, we must 'make room' for the 'Democratic Dialogue' to 'balance' the 'inequalities' in the Social and the Economy. Today, with Computerization, 'Real' Equality has become possible. But, 'that Dialogue' cannot take place in an 'unfairly structured' 'Economic Social'. Lets change the 'Real Politics' to a 'Real' Political Dialogue. Lets go back to 'real' Politics of 'Real' Freedom and 'Real' Equality. Where are the Real Politicians?

The Language of Politics is 'now very different' from the language of Economics.

The Language of 'Democratic Politics' differs from the Language of 'Economics'. The 'Institutional Function' of 'each' is different. The 'language' of Democratic Politics is 'held together' with the 'Constitutional Freedom and Equality' of Each and Every Living Individual in the Social. The language of Economics is 'held together' with the 'Value System' of Profits. A Corporate Society that makes 'no Profits' does not Exist. 'Democratic Politics' involves the 'Institutionalization' and the 'Legalization of Freedom and Equality'. No small task. The Economy, being very important to a Democracy, is 'Populated' with 'Legal Fictions' that are considered 'Legal Persons' and who are protected by the 'Constitution'. Those 'Economic Fictions', to wit, the 'Business Corporation', is a 'money making' Machine 'designed' to 'Produce' Maximum Profits. But Machinic Production has become 'Computerized' and hence the 'Real Individual' is no longer required to function as a 'Worker'. The Assembly Line has been replaced by the Computer. Of course, not all production is Machinic; nevertheless, 'Machinic Production has lessened the requirement of 'Real Workers' in the Economy. The Workers 'now required' must be 'Educated' in the 'Machinic Functioning' of the 'Modernized Economy'. But, the Computerization of some of the economic activity normally required for production now allows for 'Faster' and 'much more' Productivity and, I might add, 'Cheaper Production' because of the 'Lessening of the Work Force' and the 'Repeatability' of the 'Computational Functions. One 'Good Machine' or 'Computer' can now duplicate the 'Production activity' at a 'Faster Rate' and at a 'much Lesser Cost'. The language of Governing with Freedom and Equality is being hampered with 'Racial Discrimination' and the Economy is being 'magnified' with 'Computer Language' and their 'Tax Liability' is being Lowered. The 'productivity' that results from 'Computation' and the 'Tax reduction' of the 'Corporate Person' ( Legal Fiction) indicates that we live in a Society where 'profits' are more important then 'Freedom and Equality'. Where did 'Democracy Go' and where are the Real Politicians?

The 'Political Pulse' of a Nation involves a 'Language' between the 'Top' and the 'Bottom'.

The 'Political Pulse' of a 'Democratic Nation' involves a 'Political Language' between the 'Top of Power' and the 'Bottom', where the People live in a 'Condition of Togetherness'. That 'Political Relation' is necessary because the Top always 'Represents' the Bottom. Of course, the Bottom always has its own Language, to wit; the Language of 'everyday affairs' as expressed in 'Freedom' and 'Equality' of 'Every-One' in the 'Social Condition' of 'Togetherness'. The Top also has its Language; the Language of a 'Political Entity' as it 'Governs' and as it 'interacts' with 'Other, some 'Different', 'Political Entities' in the 'World'. But, there's a Relation that goes from the Top to the Bottom of a Democracy. The Bottom is peopled with Millions of Real Individuals and there must be communication between the Top and the Bottom of a Democracy, because the Top Represents the People and, its always the 'Bottom' that 'Fights' for 'their Country'. The point I'm trying to make is that there is a 'Language' and a 'behavior' at the 'Top' that 'differs' from the 'Language and Behavior' at the 'Bottom'. A 'Political leader' should never be ignorant of that distinction and a 'Leader' should be 'proficient' in the 'Language' of 'Politics' as well as, familiar, with the Language of 'Every-day Affairs'. But, one cannot 'mix' the language of 'Domestic Personal Affairs' with the 'Language' of a 'Democratic Political Entity' that 'Governs'. A Leader 'Represents' 'his' or 'her' People on the 'National Sphere', or, he represents the 'Nation' on the 'International Sphere'. In either case, He or She must use Political Language to 'Govern' or to 'Represent' the Nation in 'International Affairs'. But, the Language of 'Daily Affairs' is not, in either case, a Political language. A Political Position calls for a Political Language and when a Leader's Language condescends to the Level of a 'Daily Gossip Column', that Language clearly indicates that 'She' or 'He' should not be in a position of 'Leadership'. Political Language has already been contaminated with 'Economic Language' and 'Economic Values' and now we must add, the Language of 'Gossip', 'name calling', or even using 'Nick-Names'. How sad. A 'Political Entity' condescends to the 'Linguistic Level' of 'Every-Day Affairs'. Where are the Real Politicians?

Why does the 'Top' of a 'Political Entity' sound like the 'Bottom' of a 'Political Entity'?

Why does the 'Top' of a 'Political Entity' sound like the 'Bottom' of a 'Political Entity'? Because the Political Entity is a Real Democracy. A Real Democracy has a Bottom and that Bottom is constituted of Millions of real Individuals. The Top of a Democracy Represents all the Individuals who are situated at the Bottom. It is 'they' who transfer real 'Political Power' to the 'Top' by the electoral Process. In a Democracy, the Top has no other reason for existing except to Represent all the Real People at the Bottom. Hence, the 'Tops' only functions as a Political 'Site' for 'Government and Political Power'. Other than that, there is no reason to have a 'Top'. But, that transfer of 'Power' to the 'Representatives at the Top' is coupled with a 'Political Language'. That 'Political Language' involves the 'exercise of Power' and the 'necessary Language' to express that process and to 'implement' a 'Real Democracy'; one that protects the 'Freedom' and 'Equality' of all the Real Individuals and the 'Institutions' of a Democratic Nation. So, why are we hearing the Top using the 'Language of the Bottom'? Simple. The 'Top' is 'not occupied' by 'Real Politicians' who can 'Do Politics', 'Talk Democracy', and 'Do Democracy', and 'Act' for the 'benefit' of the 'Real Individuals' at the 'Bottom', viz., for You and I. School Yard swearing matches, name calling, Racial distinctions, will not function in a Real Democracy. Neither will Rich vs Poor. Democratic Politics is for those who are 'Unselfish' and who have the 'General Welfare' of the 'Other Human beings' in the 'Nation'. Politics is about a 'Representative Function', but a very 'knowledgeable' function, one that is perceptible when one gazes at the Top of Political Power and sees an 'Unselfish Representative' who is "promoting the General Welfare". Where are the Real Politicians?

The Political Top of Power has lost its Mobility, Efficiency, and 'sense' of Purpose.

The Political Top of Power has lost its 'Mobility', 'Efficiency', and sense of 'Purpose'. It has lost its 'Political Grasp' of the 'Many'. A Political Language is a General Language that includes the 'Many' in its 'Generality' and the 'Specificity' of the Individuals in their 'Condition of Togetherness'. A Political Language is also an International Language. As such, it always includes the International Sphere because the 'International Sphere' includes Other 'Political Power Structures' and 'Individuals'. When a Top loses its ability to use a Political Language, it cannot function on the 'National' or 'International Sphere'. The end-result will be a loss of 'Reputation' on the 'International Sphere' and a loss of 'function' on the 'National Sphere'. The 'National' will become 'dis-functional' and the 'International' will be perceived as 'Weak'. A Nation should never be Weak for the simple reason that it cannot speak the proper 'Language of Politics'. That's why we need a 'Real Politician' at the helm. Navigating Political Waters cannot be achieved by using the language of 'Back-Yard Brawls'. It takes a 'Real Politician', not a Businessman to drive the Ship of State. When the Political Top uses the language of the Bottom to 'drive' the Ship of State, its headed towards 'murky Waters'. The Language of the Bottom cannot drive a Political Entity of Power. A Political Entity needs a vocabulary of Politics, Generality, and respect for the 'Freedom and Equality' of the 'Real Individuals' at the 'Bottom'. A Democratic Political Top of Power is 'never' Greedy, or Self-Serving. Its there to 'Serve' the 'People', not to Rule them, nor to 'speak' the language of 'Back-Yard Brawls'. Where are the Real Politicians?

Sad. The 'Top' no longer has a 'Proper Language' to 'steer' a Nation with 'Diversity at the Bottom'.

Sad, the Top no longer has a 'Proper Language' to steer a Nation with 'Diversity at the Bottom'. A 'Real Democracy' has a 'Diverse population' at the 'Bottom'. The most important characteristic of such a Democratic Bottom is the different Races, Peoples, and belief systems at the Bottom. It is inevitable that 'Political aspirations' 'would' and 'should' motivate 'any' and 'All Different Peoples' at the Bottom. That's what democracy is all about. The language of the Constitution states We the People...in Order to form a more perfect Union,...promote the general Welfare....etc. It does not say, We the 'Democrats' or We the 'Republicans'. Its a 'People Thing', not a 'Political Party' Thing. Individuals who hold 'Political Office' should be very much aware of the fact that they only 'Represent' the People at the Bottom. They have no other function. But they're using the language of the bottom, incorporating 'Racial slurs', etc. and combining it with the 'Language of Advertising' to persuade and to create demands at the Bottom that should not have a 'Right to exist'. Public Office Holders should fight for the Freedom and Equality of everyone at the Bottom. Instead, they have 'escalated', 'elevated' and increased the 'temperature' of the every-day 'Language' of 'Hate', 'Criticism', and 'Racial Prejudices' to 'color' the so-called 'Political Language' of a Political Democracy. And all this, to Win an Election. That is not a Language of Democracy; its not a language of 'Freedom and Equality'. If the Representatives at the Top do not represent all the Real People at the Bottom, the Bottom is without 'Voice' or 'Representation'. The Bottom is not being 'Governed'; and those who 'choose' to 'Run for Office' are being 'Insulted'. That is not Democracy and the sad part is that the Individuals in 'Public Office' are the ones 'perpetuating the destruction' of the Democracy that 'elected them'. Where are the Real Politicians?

The 'Political Pulse' changes daily; but today, the Political language of the Top has been replaced by the 'Language of the Bottom'.

The 'Political Pulse' changes daily; but today, the Democratic 'Political language' of the Top has been 'replaced' by the 'Political Language' of the Bottom. How strange, what was once 'spoken' at the 'Bottom' by the 'Individual Person' is now 'used' at the 'Top'; and it is being used by Individuals in Public 'Office'. It seems as if the 'Formality of Office' or 'linguistic propriety' expected from Political Office holders is no longer implemented. Why is that? 'Political Office requires 'Political Knowledge' and 'Political Language'. No one would run for Office if She or he did not know what Politics is about. But, be careful, I do not mean being 'Politically Correct'. That is hypocrisy, Politically Vacuous, and insincere. I refer to a genuine sense of 'Serving a Nation' and the 'Many People' at the Bottom. 'Political Activity' can only be 'functional' and be 'described' on a certain 'level of Propriety'. Political Language is about 'Governing', not 'Ruling'. There are no Rulers in a Democracy, and there should be no CEO's, or 'Business Minded Office Holders'. Business is not 'Democratic'. Business is about 'Profits'; not about 'Democratic Political Policy'. Businessmen do not Govern 'Political Entities'. They 'Own and Run' Business Corporations, or, more accurately, 'Legal Fictions'. Today we 'Hear and See' 'High Office Holders' arguing like children at some 'Back-Yard barbeque', instead of a 'Political debate' about 'Democratic Values'. I refer to 'Name-calling', 'Direct and Indirect Racial referencing', and 'Petty Party criticism'. The 'Bottom' of the Nation is being divided and the Division is being caused by the 'Language' being used at the Top. How sad; A 'Political Top', a place of 'Political Power', that should be concerned with the 'Many Real Individuals' at the Bottom, in the Social, who form an 'Integrated Society'. The 'Integrity of the Nation' is at risk. Instead of 'correcting' the Racial Divide, the economic 'Class Consciousness', or the divisions of the 'Haves' and 'Have-nots', Individuals in Offices of Political Power are contributing to the further 'attenuation' of the 'Political Relation' that connects the 'Top and the Bottom', or, the 'One' and the 'Many'. That 'attenuation' destroys 'Real Democracy'. That attenuation separates the 'Top' from the 'Bottom' and those 'Real Individuals', at the 'Bottom', find themselves 'navigating' the 'Social' without a 'Real Government'. Where are the Real Politicians?

How Sad. Remember when 'People' were encouraged to 'Immigrate' to the U.S.: now, Immigration has become a Problem.

Remember when 'People' were encouraged to 'Immigrate' to the U.S.?: now, Immigration has become a Problem. Like 'Socialism', 'Immigration' has gotten a 'Bad name'. What has happened to these 'old Political concepts'. Once Immigrating to the U.S., was a 'Good Thing'. Of course, todays use of the term 'Socialism' is not the same as the 'older concept' of a 'Nation owning the 'means of Production'. Today the term is used to refer to the 'Social' as an 'Institutional place' where all the Institutions and 'Real Individuals' at the Bottom are situated. Immigrants are still allowed to come in so long as the proper Procedure is followed and the term Social is used, generally, as a reference to the Individuals, both Real and Fictional, at the Bottom of the Political Entity. What happened? The old metaphor of " We are all in the same Boat" no longer seems to apply and rightfully so. Today, its more like "we are all on the same Planet". Its a larger place; it involves many different 'Peoples' from different Nations and different Races. Why are our "so called Politicians" unmindful of that fact? Our 'World' has become 'larger' and 'smaller' at the same time, because of 'Technology' and many 'Political issues' cross 'National Boundaries'. Why isn't the United Nations involved? 'Political Issues' have changed. National Boundaries have become 'less necessary' and more Human cooperation has 'become essential'. That situation calls for 'relaxing National Boundaries' and not 'Building Walls' to encourage 'Political Isolation'. How arrogant to think any one 'particular Nation' or 'race' is entitled to the 'Planet' we live on. 'Technology' has 'enlarged' our 'perception and experience' of the 'World' we live on. Why hasn't our 'Political Knowledge' kept up with the 'changing World'? How sad, it seems that as the 'Political World' changes and should become more 'Unified', the 'Human Condition' falters and becomes less 'Human'. As 'Politics changes', the 'Human Condition' changes for the worse. National Boundaries were created to establish 'National Identities', not to create 'Haves' and 'Have-nots' among 'Nations' on the Political Stage. All Human Beings are the Same and All are 'Free and Equal'. Why do we lock up Men, Women, and Children, just because they are "Immigrants"; and Why are Nations, 'all Nations'; so against the 'Human Condition'? Where are the 'Real Leaders' and the 'Real Politicians'?

An 'Unstable' Top of Power cannot 'emit' Power.

The Political 'Top' cannot 'emit' Power if its Unstable. A Political Top is always a Top of Political Power. A Political Entity is stable to the extent it 'manifests stability' at the Top. That's why the Autocratic Form of Government is deemed to be a very Powerful 'Political Entity'. In an Autocracy, all the Power is at the Top. An Autocrat merely 'eliminates' the 'obstacle' creating whatever 'instability' may exist. However, a Democracy has Political Power at the Bottom when the 'Bottom' is considered 'Free and Equal' and when that Social is Institutionally established in such manner as to both, 'express and manifest' that 'Power' or 'Unity'. Of course, in a Democracy the Power of the Bottom is transferred to the Top. But, the Political Top is expected to manifest its Power in the manner in which it 'establishes', 'organizes' and 'manifests' the 'Social Stability' in the Political Entity. That requires a certain 'coherence' between the 'Top' and the 'Bottom' which 'manifests' and becomes 'evident' at the 'Top'. In such a case, the 'Top of Power' in a 'Democracy' emits 'Political Power'. The Top is always 'Institutional' and 'reflects' the 'Power of the Many' in a 'condition of togetherness', or, 'the People'( "WE The People") as a Whole. Hence, the 'Top is Powerful'. But, consider a Political Top that always 'bickers' with the Other Agencies, Departments, and Branches of Government, and is 'acting' as if he was still 'at the Bottom', and is trying to establish his own 'self-importance', and reflects his own 'instability', and 'engages' and is 'accused of engaging' in questionable activities; that is a sign of 'Personal Instability'. That does not occur often. When it does, it weakens the 'Top of Power' which should manifest Political Power at the 'Top'. An 'unstable Top' cannot emit 'Political Power' in an 'Institutional Entity'. An 'Unstable Top' does not emit 'Political Power', it emits weakness, Instability, and uncertainty. Where are the Real Politicians?

Democratic Government is Government "of all the People" and all of their 'Social Institutions'.

Democratic Government is Government "of all the People"; and 'all their Social Institutions'. That includes all the 'Social', 'Political', and 'Economic' Institutions 'established' to make Government 'functional' as a 'Democracy'. A Democracy should not 'only' be 'Functional', it must establish all 'necessary Institutions' to 'insure' that 'Real Democracy' has an 'Institutional foundation' for the 'materialization of a 'Real Democracy'. Of course, that includes the 'Economic arrangements' and 'functions' within Society. The 'Primary' concern of a Democracy is the 'Freedom and Equality' of all the 'real Individuals' in the 'Social'. Of course, that includes the Real Individuals in the Economy also, but the Government saw fit to 'create Legal Fictions' in the Economy and those Fictions are also to be considered 'Persons' and are Protected, as such, by the Constitution. The Judicial Branch of the Government protects those 'Persons' as Legal Fictions that exist "only in contemplation of law". The end result of that has been that no Real Human being can compete with a Corporation; or produce more than a Corporation. What happened to the Equality of the Real Individuals? Well, we could stretch a little and say, OK, so the 'Real' works alongside the 'Legal Fiction', but why not also protect the 'Real' from the 'Fictional'. Today, those fictions also produce huge 'imbalances' in the Economy by contributing to the creation of Economic Classes. Recently they even had their Tax Liability Reduced. Of course, that only applies to the Legal Fictions. So, we have a scenario where the 'Government' creates 'Legal Fictions' and then 'protects' them as 'Persons' and then does 'not require' them to pay their 'share of Taxes. There is no problem with creating 'Money Making Machines' so long as one creates 'Protections' for the 'Real Human beings' from them also and from the 'creation' of huge 'Economic classes'. And who creates this mess; the Government? Which Government? The 'Democratic One' or the 'Republican One'? Rest easy, there is no Distinction in 'Real Governing'; there is only Governing 'Real People' and 'Real necessary Institutions' that are motored by 'Freedom and Equality'. Unfortunately, the 'Political Parties' only play 'Political Games' which are 'motored by Money'. How Sad. Where are the Real Politicians?

Government is essential; Corporations are also essential; but each is 'Motored' differently.

Government is essential; Corporations are also essential; but, each is 'Motored differently'. Each must retain its separate Identity and each must be 'motored' differently. One 'Governs' Real Individuals at the Bottom of the 'Political Entity'. That's what in old times was called the 'One', and the 'Many' makes 'Profits' purportedly to create a 'balanced Economy'; that's what in old times was called the 'Many', but today it includes the Business Corporations. 'Each' has a purpose and each must function according to its nature and each must retain their 'Separate Identity', but 'never shall the Twain Meet'. Mixing the 'Motors' creates havoc in the Political Entity and in the 'so-called' Autonomous Economy. Mixing creates 'an effect' of intermixing 'Profits' with 'Governing'. That disables a Democratic Government and it does not balance the Economy. In fact, it creates a 'Plutocratic' or 'Oligarchic' condition in the 'Halls of Government' which 'changes' the characteristics of a 'Real Democracy'. A Democratic Government cannot be motored with 'Profits', and a 'Balanced Economy', cannot exist in a 'Plutocratic' or 'Oligarchic' Polity. Freedom and Equality cannot be mixed with 'Greed' in a Democracy. 'Greed' or 'Economic Greed' eventually calcifies into 'Plutocracy' or 'Oligarchy'. It creates 'Haves' and 'Have nots' and in such cases democracy cannot flourish. Freedom and Equality go out the Window, and Greed 'Flourishes' in the 'Haves' and the 'Corporate Economy'. 'Legal Fiction' overcomes 'Law and Order'. Where are the Real Politicians?

A 'Government' cannot exist without 'the Governed'.

A 'Government' cannot exist without 'the Governed'. A Government has 'Political Power', but one must always ask 'over what or whom'. Since a Government is not a 'Natural Phenomena', its an 'Institutional Phenomena', the issue always becomes, 'What' or 'Who' does it Govern? Of course, everyone agrees that a Government Governs 'Its People', and that a Democratic 'Government' was established at a 'Constitutional Convention', being called and organized by 'The People' to be 'Governed'. In other words, the 'Governed' created the 'Government'. Once created, the Government must establish the 'Social institutions' that will hold 'The People', or the 'Governed', together in a 'Condition of Integrity'. That's why a Democracy is a 'Social Institution' held together with 'Law' and 'Order'. The law creates an 'Orderly Social', or a Social governing the 'everyday interactions' of the 'People' while protecting their 'Freedom and Equality'. Without law there would be chaos. With Law, there is 'Social Order'. So, the next question is if a Business Corporation is considered 'a Person' by the Courts, and is protected by the Constitution and Law, why are there no requirements compelling a 'Legal Fiction' to act like a Democratic Citizen? Why does an Economic legal Fiction get protected but is not given any Democratic, Social Duties? All 'Human Citizens' have their 'Freedom and Equality' protected, but they are also required to 'abide by Law'. They are required to be 'Good Citizens', or pay the price. So, why are Money Making Legal Fictions created by Law? They create an Economic Imbalance that benefits the Rich, wealthy Individuals only and not the 'Economy' as a whole. The Business Corporation needs to contribute to the Democracy that allowed for their creation and they should also be 'Good Economic Institutions' that contribute to a more 'Balanced Economy'.

No democratic 'Political office' can drive a 'Political Entity' with Economic Principles.

No democratic 'Political Office' can drive a 'Political Entity' with 'Economic Principles'. Of course, the reason for that is that a Business Corporate Entity 'incorporated' for the purpose of 'making Profits' is never focused on the 'Freedom and Equality' of the 'Individuals' at the Bottom of the Entity. Its sole and 'primary purpose' for 'existence' is to make a Profit. The corporate Structure gives it Focus, Size, and hence, a Sole purpose for Existing in the Economic Sector. But, 'Business Principles' as 'Business Principles' should 'never' get involved in the Political Sector. Why not? Because, they contribute to the 'Economic Welfare' of the 'Nation' and not the 'Freedom and Equality' of the 'Real Individuals' at the Bottom. A Democratic nation must be driven by Political Principles not business Principles. Its very easy to mix the Two under the guise that it will help the Nation as a Polity. Don't kid yourself. Business Principles are 'Dictatorial' in Nature, not 'democratic', and are designed to be 'Profitable'. They do not contribute to the Freedom and Equality of the 'Real Individuals' in the Polity. A 'Political Office' requires the implementation of Democratic 'Political Principles' at the Bottom of the Polity. Principles and programs that help alleviate 'Racial Discrimination; Huge Economic Inequalities; and hopefully gets us out of the 'mental Framework' that we are a 'Corporate Society'. We are a Society of 'Real Individuals' and not a Society of 'Corporate Fictions'. Corporations make Huge Profits but they 'should also' implement 'Democratic Values'. We need to 'work' on that 'weakness'. After all, we are a 'Democratic Society'.

If Legal Fictions are "Persons", for Reasons of Economic Protection, why not also give them "Democratic Duties"?

If 'Business Corporations' are 'Legal Fictions' and are to be considered "Persons", for Reasons of 'Economic Protection', why not also give them "Democratic Duties"? After all, they are 'Total Fictional Creations' and hence, not 'Real'. But, the 'Bottom' of a 'Polity' is composed of 'Real Individuals' and hence their 'Birth-Right' of 'Freedom and Equality' must be 'Protected'. The Bottom, constituted of Real Individuals, have Democratic 'Duties', such as being 'Law Abiding', and of 'Participating in Elections'. Of course, Real Individuals are 'born Free and Equal'. No 'Political form' can take that away from them because the 'Polity' is a 'Man made Construction'. Its not a 'Natural Phenomena'. Its an Institution, its 'Human Made', and as 'Such' should have the 'Acquiescence' of the 'Bottom' or the 'Governed'. Why? Because the 'Bottom' of the Polity is the 'source' of the 'Political Power' transferred to the 'Top of a Democratic Political Institution'. No 'Human Institution', 'Political' or 'Otherwise', can deprive a 'Real human Being' of His/Her 'Natural Freedom and Equality'. So, back to the Issue. If Business Corporations are to be considered as Economic 'Persons' and are Protected by the Constitution, as such, why not also require them to 'give back' to the 'Democracy' that allowed them to 'Arise'. Certainly, a Corporation could have a 'Department' whose Function would be to protect the 'Democratic Spirit' that allowed for their 'arising' or 'creation'. In that way, the Corporation can also be a 'Good Citizen' as well as a 'Machine for making Profits'. That should be a 'Requirement', in the Corporate Charters of all 'Business Corporations'. A Democratic Economy needs to 'achieve balance' as best as possible. The way the Business Corporation is 'created' and the 'Protection' it gets from the Constitution, as a Profit making machine, creates an 'Imbalanced Economy'. Business Corporations can be 'Great Profit making Machines', but they should also be 'Good Citizens'. If the Constitution can Protect them as 'Persons', it can also 'require them' to be 'Good Citizens'. The 'Economy' needs to be 'more Balanced' in order to 'Equalize' the 'Injustices' that occur in being a 'Lopsided Monstrosity'. Where are the Real Politicians?

Politicians need to stop, just being 'Politically Correct'; and start being 'Real Politicians'.

Politicians need to stop, just being 'Politically Correct'; and start being 'Real Politicians'. And what might that entail? Well, being 'Politically Correct' might be a start, but that's not whats 'required'. The 'real Requirement' is a complete 'understanding' of the 'Nature' of a 'Political Entity'; what drives 'it' into its 'Realization'; and the 'most important aspect' is a 'complete understanding' of the 'constitutive part' played by all the 'Real People' at the 'Bottom of the Entity'. Of course, a Political Entity is just a Political Entity. Its a Man-Made construction. Its not a part of 'Nature'. No matter how necessary 'getting together' might be, its a 'Political construction' and its created by Humans. It begins 'small', like 'Friends', 'Groups', 'Families', 'Tribes', 'Indian Nations', 'States', 'Nations' or 'Countries', and finally, maybe, even, into a 'United Nations'. What began as 'were all in the Same Boat', evolves into 'were all on the 'Same Planet'. That evolution is inevitable. 'Behind' the 'Condition of Togetherness' of such 'enlarging Entities', is always a 'Genuine Intention' coupled with a 'Genuine Sincerity' to 'hold together' as a 'Collective Identity'. That 'Intention' and that 'Sincerity' is what 'Drives' a 'Genuine Politician'. Political Correctness is a vacuous, empty, wish for the 'Political Power' inherent in 'Political Office' without the 'genuine selflessness' and 'Genuine Knowledge' required of a 'Genuine Politician. A Real Politician knows that the only 'Political Power' there is, is the 'Power' that is 'inherent' in the 'Real People' in their 'Condition of Togetherness' at the 'Bottom' of the 'Political entity'. That Power is 'transferred' by means of the 'Vote' to the 'Top' of the 'Political Entity', for the 'duration of Office'. No human Being can 'Govern' or 'Rule' another unless 'Institutionally' permitted and only for the 'duration of Office'. 'All Human beings' are 'Politically Free and Equal', and hence 'Governing' is the 'establishment and guidance' of the 'Real People' who live in 'Freedom and Equality'. There is 'no other Reason' for the existence of 'Democratic Government' and a Politician serving in Office' in such a Government, should serve the People 'Intentionally and Sincerely' and not just 'Politically Correct'. Where are the Real Politicians?

No One can 'drive' a 'Democratic Political Entity' with only a 'Capitalistic Motor'.

No One can 'drive' a 'Democratic Political Entity' with only a 'Capitalistic Motor'. The'Two Activities' are entirely 'different' from each other and each requires 'energizing' by 'its own' Separate Motor. Of course, the Economy is energized by the 'Capitalistic Motor' and the Democratic Political Entity is energized by 'Freedom and Equality' of 'Each and Every' 'Real Individual' at the Bottom of the Political Entity. Governing Democratically does not require 'Profits', but a successful Capitalistic endeavor does. In a Democracy both are essential but they cannot be 'inextricably mixed' or 'misused'. So, why do these Two Basic Impulses' or 'drives' get so entangled? One 'Reason' is that the 'Economy', in general, is very 'Lopsided' and 'Unbalanced'. For example, the Economy established 'Business Corporate entities' or, 'Legal Fictions', that function as 'Persons', and 'who' get 'Legal Protection' from the 'Courts' and the 'Constitution'. No 'Real Human Being' can compete with a 'Legal fiction'. Its too 'Big to Fail'. The 'Economic Grasp' of the Corporation is 'huge' and if an 'Important Corporation' is failing, it merely gets help from the Government. Not to mention, that if a 'Corporate Person' is not making enough 'Profits', it can be 'dissolved' and another is 'created' and is given a 'Different Name' and basically 'continues its existence'; a kind of 'Immortality'. But how can it continue its existence? simple, it has the 'Same Owners', or Family Members as did the defunct one. No 'Real Human Being' can compete with that; nor with the 'cumulative Results' of such a 'Continuation'. A successful 'Business Corporation' can exist for over 300 yrs. A 'Business Corporation' has an 'Incomparable Economic Grasp' and, too boot, 'Economic Immortality'. The Political problems arise when Billionaires, Millionaires, the Rich get into Political Office and try to 'drive' a 'Political Entity' with 'Business Principles' or a 'Business Motor', instead of a 'Political Motor' involving Democratic Principles. Where are the Real Politicians?

Politicians are necessary because they can 'Influence' the Components and Structure of the Social.

Politicians are necessary because they can 'Influence' the 'Components' and the 'Institutional Structure' of the 'Social'. Most other Professionals are concerned with 'smaller Components' of the Social, e.g. Medical, Legal, Business, Familial and other 'Institutional aspects' of the Social. Notice that I call them 'Professional'. And so they should be, because they 'can help pass laws' controlling the use of Firearms, medicines, Familial Relations, and 'many other aspects' of the Social. 'Politics' is an important 'function' of the 'Political Entity' and its 'Political Appendages'. Hence, in a Democracy, politicians should be well-versed in the Institutional make-up of the Social and the 'things necessary' to keep 'Democracy viable'. In other words, Politicians should be knowledgeable in the differences in 'Autocratic' and 'Democratic' Political Entities. Business Corporations function very much like Autocracies Function. Of course, there are differences, but, nevertheless, a Business Corporation has one purpose for existing, as does an Autocracy. The Business Corporation exists to make a 'profit' and an Autocracy exists to 'Rule' the Political Entity. Neither functions Otherwise. Hence, it is important for Politicians to be knowledgeable in both arenas. In a Democracy, we don't need Individuals in 'Political Positions' who are merely concerned with 'Making a Profit', 'Self-Inflation', or 'Self-Aggrandizement'. We need knowledgeable Politicians who can appreciate the difference and who can 'make a difference' in a Democracy. Of course, that's the the 'danger' of having a so-called 'Politician' who is 'more Businessman' and 'less Politician'. When the Top of Power is operated as a Business, that is 'not a Democratic Government', its a 'Powerful Machine' being used for 'advantage', 'Self Perpetuation' and 'Self-Aggrandizement'. 'Democracy' can never be 'viable' in a 'Governmental Entity' operated with 'Business Principles'. In such cases, 'Democratic Principles' die and 'Autocratic Principles' Rule. Where are the Real Politicians?

Is it too demanding for a Politician to be 'Altruistic'? Why do we have Politicians?

Is it demanding to much for Politicians to be Altruistic? What other 'motive' should a 'Public Official' have and why do we have Politicians? Politics is the most difficult discipline in the World because it requires a 'certain kind' of 'selflessness' and great efforts in the establishment of 'Social' and 'Political' Entities that benefits the 'Whole Bottom' viz. the real Individuals at the Bottom. That's the source of all 'Power' in a 'Democracy'. At the same time this discipline should benefit the 'Strength and Power' of the Political Entity as 'Political Entity' in the World. Of course, Political Offices 'earn' a pretty high Salary; they are not serving 'gratuitously'. Of course they won't get Rich from their Salary. But, if 'Service' in a Democracy, is not the Goal of a Politician, why not do something else? After all, Politics 'is a Service'. Certainly, one way to 'World Recognition' and 'Respect' is through Political Office. But, not all human 'motivations' are 'honest' and 'above board'. Here, of course, we could discuss different Political Systems and how they 'function'. Autocracies are expected to function as Autocracies. But, our concern is 'Democracy' in a Democracy. One very important 'factor' is not so much the 'Autocratic Attitude', in a Real political sense, but an honest 'Business Attitude', i.e., a motivation arising from having being a 'successful Businessman'. As we have already pointed out, the 'Business Engine' in 'Capitalism' is very 'different' from the 'Political Engine' in a Democracy. The Business Engine is energized by 'More and More of the same', or Money, or, if you like, Greed. But, the Political Engine in a Democracy is energized by the 'Freedom and Equality' of 'each and every' 'Real Individual' at the 'Bottom' of the 'Political Entity'. I say, 'Real Individual' at the 'Bottom', because I cannot include 'Corporations' that are 'Legal Fictions', 'not' 'Real Persons', and that received their 'protection' from the Supreme Court. Here, then is a Social Problem. A 'Real genuine attitude', arising 'from success' in 'Capitalistic Activity', imperceptibly, 'slipping into' Democratic Government as an 'Aspect of Freedom and Equality' of Real Individuals... a complete infusion of 'More and more of the same', or Greed, into the 'Social Fabric' of 'Freedom and Equality' of 'Real Human Beings'. A 'Genuine Political Motivation' of 'Freedom and Equality', 'overcome', 'inextricably', by 'Business Motivation', 'Greed', that leads us into a 'Social' that 'Divides' and 'Defines' us as 'Haves' and 'Have-nots'. The 'Sad' part is that the arising of the 'Haves' stems from the 'protection' of the 'Corporation' as a 'Legal Fiction' created by the 'Supreme Court. 'Surrealism' has truly taken over. Where are the Real Politicians?