Every Governmental Top has a Bottom; and every Governmental Bottom has a Top.

Every Governmental Top has a Bottom and every Governmental Bottom has a Top. Thats the only manner in which a Governemntal Entity can exist: a Top that Governs or Rules and a Bottom that is Governed or Ruled. That seems to be the only solution to the problematic of thr One and the Many. But, even in a Democracy, the problem seems to be that some Democratic Tops dont seem to mind 'Ruling' and some Democratic Bottoms seem to be to 'eagar' to 'ascend to the Top' or become 'Agents of the Top' and to 'Rule'. Of course, in a Democracy the Top is voted-in by the Bottom so its Individuals at the Bottom voting in 'Leaders' that ascend to the Top to Govern and to protect the 'Democratic equilibrium' of 'Democracy'. But, even in a Democracy, some 'Agents' at the Top dont seem to be satisfied with 'Governing' and are to eager to 'Rule', or to benefit from their positions of Power. It would seem that in a Democracy the Bottom would be appreciative of its Freedom and Equality and would dedicate themselves to the business of 'Governing'. What happened? Where has the Political Organization of a 'Democracy' gone wrong? Maybe were asking the wrong question. Democracy hasn't gone wrong, its an Ideology, maybe the 'human Condition' has gone wrong. Where has the Human Condition gone wrong? Well, one of the first things that happened is that the 'People at the Bottom' formed into opposing 'Political Parties'. That already injects into Democracy, 'different concepts' about 'Government' and the 'relation' that must exist between the Top and the Bottom. Now we have the 'Republican Way' and the 'Democratic Way'. If they're truly both 'democratic' organizations, whats the problem? It seems to come down to the 'Individuals' who are involved in 'Politics'. Why is the 'Human Condition' so infatuated with Political Power?