How does one distinguish between a 'Democrat'; an 'Autocrat'; and a 'Politically Correct' Politician.

How does one distinguish between a genuine 'Democrat', an Autocrat and a 'Politically Correct' Politician? Its not easy and its important to know the 'Ideologies' in order to understand the 'Personalities' that motivate the 'Individuals' to be eligible for 'Public office'. Of course, the Autocrat serves in an Autocracy, so the form of Governemnt is already established. In such cases there, I assume, are many ways of determining who will be at the Top. Usually its someone 'already Politically Popular', 'Influencial'or who has been 'Handed' the Office. But, be assured it will be someone who will continue to rule in the Autocratic manner. Since Autocracies have absolute control of the Ideology, they can determine or influence the manner of ascendng and perpetuating the Time frame of Office. In manny cases the Autocrat dies or becoms unable to Rule and is replaced by other means. However, a candidate in a Democracy needs 'exposure' to His or Her 'ambition' and qualifications to assume the Power at the Top. Since the Top has few qualifications to Run for Office, its popular to just say 'Anyone' can 'Run for Office'. Of course, it takes Money, Influence, Popularity, and Knowledge of the Ideology. No one who is 'unfamiliar' with the 'Democratic ideology' can purport to 'Govern' a Democracy. That's the vital aspect of becoming a 'true Representaive of the People'. That means all the People and not just the 'Party Ideologues'. 'Party Ideology' is a 'compromised Form' of Democracy. The Bottom separates from 'other Parts' of the Bottom and a 'tension' between 'Party Loyalty' is 'added' to the the normal tensions within a 'Democratic Polity'. The Top remains the Same, but in fact it also causes a 'tension' at the 'Top' that derives from Party Loyalty. In other words, tensions and loyalties 'creates an Opposition' at the Top that should'nt be there. The end result is an 'Antagonistic Politics' at the Top where economic values 'replace' those of 'Freedom and Equality'. The 'shift' goes from Politics, to Party Loyalty, to a value system of 'Money' and 'Economic Imbalances' in the Social.