If we lived in a 'Real Democracy', the 'Division' at the Bottom would not be Problematic.

If we lived in a 'Real Democracy', the 'Division' at the 'Bottom' would not be problematic. Why? Because the Bottom would still be Democratic and persue democratic Values. But, the division at the Bottom shifted its value system into an Economic Position. A 'Political Position' that has a high concern for Money and Profits and the 'Corporate Structures'or, the 'Constitutional Persons in Contemplation of Law', has shifted into the 'Economic Sphere' and no longer espouses 'Democracy' and the 'Freedom and Equality' of 'All Real Individuals' at the 'Botttm'. Certainly The Economy is very important to a Political Entity, but so is the 'Freedom and Equality' of the 'Real Individual'. The Individual at the Bottom is Real and Democratic Values are designed to benefit the 'Human Condition' and not necessarilly the 'Constitutional Persons'. They are Legal fictions. Constitutional Persons should also follow Democratic values and not 'solely contribute' to a so-called 'Corporate Society'. 'Corporate Societies' do not 'need' Government, they are creatures of Government and need to be better Controled by Government. After all, Government 'creates them' and should also control them. Government issues their 'Corporate Charters' and describes their 'Function' in that Charter. The main characteristic should be that such 'Creations' are required to 'function Democratically' and not function as 'Autocrats'. Once they become 'democratic' they can 'better contribute' towards the 'Freedom and Equality' that characterizes the Bottom. If a Democracy can 'Create' 'Constitutional Persons', they should be able to 'Control' their Function.