If the 'Business Corporation' is a 'Person', why isn't it a 'Democratic Person'?

If the 'Business Corporation' is a 'Constitutional Person', why isn't it a 'Democratic Person'? Its considered a 'Legal Fiction' and apparently has the advantage of being protected by the 'Constitution', as a 'Person', so why not make it a 'Democratic Person'. After all, Real Persons are expected to be 'Law Abiding' and 'act and behave' in a 'Democratic manner'; so, if the Courts create a 'Legal Fiction' and protects it with the 'Constitution', why not create 'one' that also has 'Constitutional Duties' or, 'Democratic values'? How can the Courts declare a 'Legal Fiction' to be a 'Person in contemplation of Law' and not address the issue of 'a Person' that exists in a 'Democracy'? 'A Person' 'that' is entitled to 'Protection'; and as having 'Democratic Duties' like all other 'Real Persons'. The Business Corporation is a Legal Fiction; it was created to function in the Economy and as such its a 'Money Making machine' and exists for the 'Sole Purpose' described in its 'Purpose Clause'. It has no other reason to exist. The Social Problem created is that as a Money Making Machine, it also creates an 'Economic imbalance' between 'it' and 'Real Persons' in the 'Social'; and 'that' also establishes 'Economic Classes' in the Social. So, why not make it 'More Democratic' and 'give it' some 'Democratic Duties'. Its 'unequal stature' and 'function' among 'Real Human Persons' in the 'Social' is obvious; so, why not require that every Business Corporation have a 'Democratic Department', that makes 'Contributions', both 'Social and Economic', towards 'Democracy'.