Can a World war resolve an internal war or a National revolution?

A World War will never resolve a National revolution. Obviously, a World situation is way bigger than a National situation and never shall either reconfigure the political situation in the Other. The only result is that the National shall be left in shambles and the World may have aligned itself into a political arrangement, less pleasing or more pleasing, than the original arrangement of Nations. Even the revolutionary forces within the National shall be re-distributed in such fashion that the outcome can never be foretold. The outcome could be worse that the initial problem. But what choice does any Nation have if the activity to be 'corrected' is the destruction of the very basis of all governments; viz; the human condition? Certainly, the activity to be 'corrected' must be addressed. If it can be resolved diplomatically, so much the better. If not, military force is warranted. Nevertheless, the 'International' must always respect any attempt to solve the situation in a peaceful way. If such should be the case, that attempted resolution should be respected and acknowledged by all Nations in the International community. That move does not justify 'mingling' with the National problems of that nation, viz. the revolution. Each Nation must resolve its own internal problems. But, how does the enforcement of an International violation not cause an interference with the National situation. To be sure, it will have an effect, to wit; it will eliminate the use of chemical weapons on a National scene. The International problem is the use of these weapons on the National scene, which may cause their use to spread to the International scene. That is an International problem, not the National problem. The revolution must continue, because the Right to revolution exists in all governments, whether democratic or autocratic. Governments, all governments, are founded on the People. The essence of government are the People.